It is an undeniable truth that young teens are having sex. Brainwashed by dishonest and sex-charged propaganda in the media, kids start believing at a young age that their futures as young adults must necessarily include promiscuous sexual behavior. Without even realizing it “the average kid today is immersed in sexual imagery” (Masland, MSNBC). In fact, CBS News released an article which found that youth exposed to high levels of media are more than twice as likely to engage in sexual intercourse (Lagorio).
Think about it; almost every popular song on any contemporary radio station has a provocative message. Practically every movie that is targeted for teens includes some allusion to (or explicitly shows) teens having sex. Magazines created for American youth carry graphic articles and advertisements that beguile the young reader into thinking that rampant and reckless sexual activity is merely the natural and expected behavior of people their age. And one musn’t underestimate the power of peer-pressure; think of the insanely cliché but still-relevant stereotype of high schoolers loosing their virginity on prom night. In light of the philosophies that our youth hold, sometimes the concept of refraining from sex is ruthlessly ridiculed in these settings.
Besides some religious organizations, there is virtually no institution anymore that promotes the idea of abstinence. And with this constant bombardment of sex (from the media, their peers and even their role models) what are kids to think in this world? How are they to even know that abstinence exists as an alternative option to sex?
For this reason, schools need to be the place where kids hear about abstinence. The programs that they endorse should be based on abstinence-only sexual education. While the governmental administration between 1998 and 2003 put a large quantity of federal dollars (250 million in fact) towards the Title V initiative which promoted abstinence (Advocates for Youth 1), the current Obama administration did not renew this grant in the 2010 budget (Kliff, Newsweek) and our nation’s children are at risk of losing this last, sex-free safe haven. For the good of our youth in a poisoned society, this cannot happen.
There is currently little congruence and conformity regarding nation-wide sexual education; it varies between school districts and states. While some kids sing songs about abstinence and talk about ways to date without having sex, other kids (myself included in this latter category when I was a tot) are handed a banana and a condom and are shown how to put it on. What these pubescent, hormonally-uncontrollable teens need is NOT the know-how and the necessary tools to go wild (one could say that’s like giving a drug addict a needle and then asking him or her not to use it), but rather a consistent emphasis on waiting for sex until they are actually physically, mentally and emotionally ready for it. And all schools should be promoting this uniform mentality; the fact that comprehensive programs out there are sending mixed signals to kids is what could potentially undermine the impact of abstinence-only education.
You may be thinking but most would agree that abstinence-only education is ineffective. This is not true; the undisputed fact remains that the most certain way to stop STDs from spreading and from teen pregnancy occurring is by abstaining entirely from sex. The Planned Parenthood Website states that “used continuously, abstinence is 100 percent effective in preventing pregnancy. It also prevents STDs.” Like I said earlier, the key to its success will be promoting it in a collective and organized way. But how is abstinence only education going to benefit those who are already sexually active? you say. It would be entirely wrong to presume that these students would not be positively affected; the article by Collins, Alagiri and Summers states that “some students choose abstinence after initiation of sexual activity with about one in four student who report having had sex also reporting current abstinence.” If anything, abstinence-only education can only benefit all young individuals.
Perhaps you are thinking but what about the facts; numbers and statistics show that thousands of teens out there get pregnant and contract STDs to which I say “Indeed, let’s look at the facts”…
According to the article “Abstinence Only Vs. Comprehensive Sex Education”, The U S. has the highest teen pregnancy and STD rates in the developed world (Chris Collins, Alagiri, Summers, 2); there are up to 850,000 teen pregnancies every year (Advocates for Youth: Effective Sex Education 1). Additionally, “the great majority of the 10,000 annual new HIV infections among people under 22 occurs through sexual activity” (Collins, Alagiri, Summers 1) and 3 million teens contract STDs each year (Rector 1).
These numbers, rather than hurt my argument, show exactly why abstinence is so important. “Abstinence education programs for youth have been proven to be effective in reducing early sexual activity…[and] provide the foundation for personal responsibility” (Rector 1). In this same article, the author brings up the point that besides just eliminating those astonishing statistics, abstinence also prevents youth from incurring severe emotional and mental injury, and simultaneously reduces their likelihood of engaging in other high-risk activities. The article also evaluates the success of such programs as Virginity Pledge Programs, Not Me, Not Now, Operation Keepsake, and Postponing Sexual Involvement. When schools offer these supportive resources, and encourage youth to seek alternative activities to sex, abstinence-only education is both beneficial and effective.
For those of you who still aren’t quite convinced, and that think that comprehensive sex-ed is a good idea, consider the ‘age of consent’ law (recall that this is a state’s legal age limit of when youth can engage in sexual activity). The youth below this age who are receiving comprehensive sex-ed are essentially being encouraged by the school to break the law. If sex is illegal at this point in their lives, why should they even be talking about it? Rather, abstinence only education is the only way to comply with this regulation.
Thus, it is for many reasons that schools should be using abstinence-only education programs; if not to provide youth with alternative options to intercourse in a sex-ridden society, to halt the STD epidemic and reduce teen pregnancies. After all, “True abstinence education programs help young people to develop an understanding of commitment, fidelity, and intimacy” (Rector 8 ) which will positively affect all aspects of their lives.
Collins, Alagiri, Summers. “Abstinence Only vs. Comprehensive Sex Education: What are the arguments? What is the evidence?” Progressive Health Partners, 2002.
“Effective Sex Education”. Advocates for Youth
Kliff, Sara. “The Future of Abstinence”. Newsweek Oct. 2009 < http://www.newsweek.com/id/219818/page/1>
Lagorio, Christine. “Media May Prompt Teen Sex.” CBSNews April 2006 <http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/04/03/health/webmd/main1464262.shtml>
Masland, Molly. “Carnal Knowledge: the sex ed debate.” MSNBC News 2009 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3071001/
Rector, Robert E. “The Effectiveness of Abstinence Education Programs in Reducing Sexual Activity Among Youth.” http://www. Heritage.org/Research/Ramily/BG1533.cfm